i was THIS close to clubbing tonight but i decided to not give in to temptation and come straight home! :) was at lido macs studying.. and the music they were playing made me soooo tempted to just say.. "okay lah lets go!" haha.

there are alot of major projects this term. but somehow i feel A LITTLE bit excited about doing it. haha. decided im gonna stop work for awhile... i need time for my school work and school is so much more important than work!

went to taka m1 today to visit my 2 favourite guys from westmall. :( now they're there no one to tease me allll day (randy) and no one to call me hokkien pro (alan) anymore.

rewind to school. art theory class. during the last hour of art theory, we watched a charliechaplin movie. or rather just half an hour of it. (after the video, when tony came into the class and switched on the lights... he said.. "okay everyone stop touching each other"... SO WRONG! WAHLAO EH!) anyway. oh yah as i was saying.. after the video.. mister tony fulloffunnyweirdwrongcomments see asked the class about our views and how the happenings in that clip, is so different as of today. modernism yadayada. yes steph? i think i might be wrong cos i was quiteee sleepy. anyway. yah. so...... there was this comment that was mention by someone.. im not sure who, i think it was me. i said sth like.. "without money now, there isnt any love." and it sparked off a debate. "no money, no honey? no money, no love?" was basically the main topic. or rather.... no money means you'll be nothing in todays society. and basically they were focusing on.... no love?

is money important when you're in a r/s?
without money, can a marriage survive?
or is love just an illusion?
money leads to a slow death, love is a quick way to die. yes or no?
you can have all the love you need from your significant other.. but seriously..... can all the love buy you a roof over your head? can all the love give you food? can you then, survive on love alone? i told my friend, having sex really wont provide you with food and a roof over the couples head. but then again, this can spark off a whole..... "why is there sex when there is love?" which is something that we will address some other time. no i am not saying that i am supporting the whole love comes with sex thing. neither am i supporting the whole sex before love thing. its crap lah. anywayyyy. shit lemme continue. so like ALMOST everyone one who was participating in the debate agreed that.... no money, no love. and yah a variety of partners is surely a bonus. i say ALMOST why? because i have a classmate who was so against ALLLL of us. she was getting all so defensive and literally shouting/screaming saying that.... "you have never felt true love before. you will know when you feel it."..... and then you feel EVERYONE else rolling our eyes. i mean.... seriously...... true love? more like true lust. she is just in love with love i would like to conclude.

and of cos, how could we all go thru this debate without the comments of the guys in the class, calvin and jimmy. and also not forgetting the lecturer tony see. so you see.. jimmy came up with this.. girls are just materialistic. if girls have no money, the guy wouldnt mind and he will just support her. (i believe we are talking in context to marriage. and also r/s).... BUT you see so this means..... when it comes to the case whereby the guy is the broke one.. the girl will ditch the guy. love or no love. whether or not the sex is good, mind blowing and everything else.

so does that make girls the materialistic one? but..... if the girl is the one supporting the guy, doesnt that make the guy the gigglo, toyboy and whatsayyou??

owell. at least the conclusion for today, in a class of 23, one girl still believes in true love. there is hope for all the guys out there. look for her. she will support you. because love is everything.

haha shit, and no im not a bitch.